-
Discussion BoardsOpen MenuDiscussion Boards Open Menu
-
BlogsOpen Menu
- HP Support Forum Home
- >
- Printers
- >
- 3D Scanning
- >
- Re: David Enhancement Request

- Subscribe
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
David Enhancement Request
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-09-2017 11:42 PM
Hi. I've used Hp (David) Scanner for years. Also I've used FlexScan3D too.
At a comparison, I think Hp Scanner need some enhancements to be absolutely better than Flex.
- Marker for alignment: Round circle markers for alignment. it is very important for a professional 3dscanner. I think it is soooo important.
- Calibration method: David (Hp) Calibration Panel is hard to manufacture. Also it is difficult to carry it (specially big calibration panels). maintenance is difficult too.
But Flexscanner use a simple flat Chessboard for calibration. Its calibration takes longer but I think it is more reliable and accurate. Also Flex calculate Max&Min Object-Camera distance automatically.
- Free Alignment using Portion of Scan: Flex allow user to select a portion of a scan to rough align scans. David users use a similar method; they get a copy of a scan and remove unwanted regions from copy and ...
I hope Hp Can Make this Enhancements for its user.
Regards.
Re: David Enhancement Request
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-10-2017 11:15 AM
While I agree I'd like something simpler than the calibration corner (by simpler I mean something that doesn't need to be as exacting) the David calibration is much simpler and faster than the HDi. I've used a bunch of other scanners and I see what David did by making the calibration the way they did. I also agree that calibration in David needs to be a bit more robust. Hopefully when they get the OptomizedualCamera setting working (it still isn't in 5.1 and I'll post more on that later today), David will be better.
Re: David Enhancement Request
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-22-2017 05:58 PM
I would love to have target markets implemented
Re: David Enhancement Request
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-23-2017 07:44 AM
Oteck wrote:I would love to have target markets implemented
out of curiosity why do you want this? I could see it to help correct for errors in calibration or other factors distorting scans. But FWIW with good calibration I haven't needed/use targets for a while.
Re: David Enhancement Request
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2017 06:20 PM
For alignment.... like the post stated. I've had many challenges trying to align flat surfaces with hardly any distinction so this is a must