03-09-2017 11:42 PM
Hi. I've used Hp (David) Scanner for years. Also I've used FlexScan3D too.
At a comparison, I think Hp Scanner need some enhancements to be absolutely better than Flex.
- Marker for alignment: Round circle markers for alignment. it is very important for a professional 3dscanner. I think it is soooo important.
- Calibration method: David (Hp) Calibration Panel is hard to manufacture. Also it is difficult to carry it (specially big calibration panels). maintenance is difficult too.
But Flexscanner use a simple flat Chessboard for calibration. Its calibration takes longer but I think it is more reliable and accurate. Also Flex calculate Max&Min Object-Camera distance automatically.
- Free Alignment using Portion of Scan: Flex allow user to select a portion of a scan to rough align scans. David users use a similar method; they get a copy of a scan and remove unwanted regions from copy and ...
I hope Hp Can Make this Enhancements for its user.
03-10-2017 11:15 AM
While I agree I'd like something simpler than the calibration corner (by simpler I mean something that doesn't need to be as exacting) the David calibration is much simpler and faster than the HDi. I've used a bunch of other scanners and I see what David did by making the calibration the way they did. I also agree that calibration in David needs to be a bit more robust. Hopefully when they get the OptomizedualCamera setting working (it still isn't in 5.1 and I'll post more on that later today), David will be better.
06-23-2017 07:44 AM
I would love to have target markets implemented
out of curiosity why do you want this? I could see it to help correct for errors in calibration or other factors distorting scans. But FWIW with good calibration I haven't needed/use targets for a while.