I'm not sure why, but in my 1st attempt posting this question, it got lumped as an answer to my preceding question. It is a different question. Here is my 2nd attempt.
I'm debating whether to disable HP Sure Click. I understand the idea of protection from malware online. I'm not sure, however, what the benefit is of asking me whether I want to remove protection of email attachments or files linked to from web pages, e.g., Word/PDF files, image files. It significantly interferes with my work flow to browse a document using Chromium (which Sure Click uses for PDFs), use MS Photo intsead of Firefox for images, and not being able to use the former to advance/regress through a sequence of saved *.jpg files.
Other than simply asking to remove protection from all files, what other benefits is there from HP Sure Click? I assume that sandboxing is no longer in effect if I choose to remove the protection.
Yes, I appreciate that it is my choice. I am trying to inform that decision. As I described, I am currently prompted to remove protection, so it seems to me that I'm not benefiting anyway. I really don't need PDF files opened in Chromium, and malware in Word/*.jpg files aren't something that I've heard of. I describe a lot of hindrance for that kind of protection, so before I disabled Sure Click, I was wondering what plausible scenarios I may not have considered. That was the main gist of my question. Your response does not address this.
Be alert for scammers posting fake support phone numbers and/or email addresses on the community. If you think you have received a fake HP Support message, please report it to us by clicking on "Flag Post".