TPM update for spectre x360 13-4003

[nomezd]

I recently upgraded to windows 10 april 2018 edition and was given a warning that a firmware updated is needed for my processor. I followed the link to HP's site where I could find the available firmware updates. However, it seems like there are two entries for the same group of computers. Could anyone at HP verify if this is a mistake? Can I assume my model fits in the top category?

Thank you,

-nomezd

HP Spectre x360 Convertible PC (models 13-4100 ~ 4199)

SLB9660 TPM 1.2 ver. 4.43.257.0

SP82133

https://ftp.hp.com/pub/softpaq/sp82001-82500/sp82133.exe

HP Spectre x360 Convertible PC (models 13-4100 ~ 4199)

SLB9665 TPM 2.0 ver. 5.62.3126.0

SP84318

https://ftp.hp.com/pub/softpaq/sp84001-84500/sp84318.exe

[banhien]

@nomezd

From what I can see, depending on your current TPM version (1.2 or 2.0) you have to use the first or the second SP or you have to use both, the first one first then the second one.

Regards.

[nomezd]

Thanks for your quick reply.

My only concern on using either of these executable files is that my model number is not listed at all. Instead, both links are for model versions 13-4100 ~ 4199; none are for 13-4000~4099.

Is there any way for HP to verify that this is NOT a mistake?

nomezd

[vanfidel]

I had the same exact question and was also wondering if it was a typo. Did you end up installing it?

[nomezd]

I did NOT install it. Waiting to get confirmation.

[nomezd]

Is there an HP authorized support person that could verify this question for us?

[KL9]

Same question here... my model is 13-4003dx

[FirehawkV21 · Accepted solution]

Well... Windows Defender can tell you which TPM version the system ships with. Open Windows Defender Security Center (double-clicking on the shield icon) and head to Device Safety -> Details for the Safety Management Program. Look on Specification Version. Then download the version of the TPM update that corresponds to the spec version.

[nomezd]

Thanks @firehawkv21. That made it a lot easier to understand. It worked. And thank you @banhien for your earlier explanation